by Mat Churchill
Property owners in Port Douglas are being detrimentally affected by the relationship between insurance companies and body corporate managers, according to Roger Ward of nqhomeloans.com.au.
Mr Ward said that body corporate managers receive up to 20% commission from insurance companies to sell their product, and recent natural disasters have resulted in sky-rocketing premiums in Far North Queensland.
"I come from a financial services background and all I can tell you is the Federal Government has been spending, in incorporation with the States, I reckon four years, trying to get rid of relationships exactly like this.
"Where the main problem is, is that these people get paid on the amount of the premium, and they're not rewarded to benefit the customer."
Mr Ward, who sits on the body corporate committee of Portland Green, recently received an insurance renewal notice from GIO via his body corporate manager showing an amount payable of $14,598, up from $3,700 on the previous year.
An email from Portland Green's body corporate manager stated "…there were four companies that declined to quote for your insurance. This is the only company that has agreed to insure your building. We will now have to increase the proposed budget to cover this massive increase."
Mr Ward said commission rates, while mentioned in the renewal, need to be clearly communicated.
"Disclosure is one thing and they have disclosed it, but they certainly don't make it known to anybody upfront and when they're giving you these quotes they're simply not putting an addendum there that says, by the way, 20% of that premium will be going to them (the body corporate manager).
"What they're not telling you is that their insurance brokers are not accredited with every insurer in the market, and what was happening and specifically in Suncorp's case they dropped their broker market, and last year when we were insured with Suncorp we received instructions from our body corporate manager that Suncorp wouldn't insure us. But that wasn't the case. Suncorp just wouldn't use a broker and when I went to them direct they insured us."
On receiving the renewal notice Mr Ward contacted a number of insurance companies to gain quotes directly and the outcome was astonishing, resulting in a quote from WFI for just $4,122, $10,476 less than what was listed on the renewal notice.
"It's because we got involved in the process and went to the market ourselves we've reduced our initial cost by around $10,000. In our body corporate that would translate to $1,200 per lot owner in savings. That's $300 a quarter. . .the first call I made gave us a saving of $6,000.
"What's happening there is that some body corporates. . .if they're taking the word of their body corporate manager and accepting these quotes, they could be paying substantially higher strata fees purely because of that and for no other reason than the body corporate managers are fully informed and taking commission. The relationship is corrupted by the process."
An employee in the body corporate management industry who did not want to be named said that body corporate managers often access insurance brokers to do the leg work, resulting in a one-off "finders fee" for the body corporate manager, and a commission for the insurance broker, based on the renewal and policy amounts.
"We usually manage buildings for about $3 per lot per week, which is a cup of coffee. The way we can do that is through managing a lot of buildings at once. So we wouldn't necessarily get a quote and then write to everyone and ask for a quote because it's very exhaustive.
"The committee can go out and get quotes and we can give them the information they need, the claims history, (and) evaluation if possible. "
Forget all about the sideshow of brokerage. The major insurers, including Suncorp, have had a tax deductible lunch together somewhere and decided to gouge the crap out of all bodies corporate throughout the state. No public liability policy for body corporate insurance has escaped their predatory action in charging multiples of previous premiums.
Where is the ACCC?
The bottom line here is Body Corporate Committees need to shop around. It can save them money.
That certainly is an interesting "spin" in your interpretation of the relationships and lets clarify the facts.
There is a direct relationship between the building sum insured and the premium amount and the same applies for the loan amounts your customers request and your commissions and trail.
You could select the best loan to suit your needs due to the financial institutions offering different incentives for mortgage brokers selling their products. Sounds like the same thing Mr Ward!, however.... the body corporate manager as an individual does not keep the incentive as it is paid to the company they represent! The body corporate manager should not be affliated with a broker as you have insinuated by saying "Body Corporate managers broker" as this would constute a huge conflict of interest.
As the renewals are annual, it gives you a full 12 months to shop around as you have done and in the end it is up to the consumer to choose the best product whether that is the most economical or delivers the best service.
Buyer beware!
Just wanted to say a few things about Dans comment. Dans comparison of Finance Brokers commissions is not really pertinent. Firstly, Finance brokers get remunerated on the loan amount only. The reason is so they can give free and unencumbered advice and not be influenced by the cost of the product provided. The opposite is apparent with commissions earned from these insurance premiums. These are payable on the premium NOT the insured amount which would be a better comparison to the finance industry.
This idea of higher insurance premiums translating to higher commissions is at the heart of the problem. I feel it leaves the relationship between the Body Corporate Manager and its client, the body corporate committee, open to financial incentives that can undermine 'best practice'.
What I'm trying to make people aware of here is that there may be better and cheaper insurance options than what the Body Corporate Managers broker has quoted on.
Dan, I don't have problems with people earning money for their work, however I do have a problem when commissions are structured to undermine a 'value for money' proposition. In this case, people are only getting paid for higher premiums, not better product or services.
Very interesting article however you will find that the "finders fee" is payable by the broker from the brokers commission therefore I think that Roger is crucifying the wrong party in this case. Should a body corporate use a broker that does not pay commission, and there are plenty out there, the premium payable by the BC will not necessarily be smaller.
It is the same case as Roger receiving a commission from the financial institution in which he places his customers finance through for home loans. Is Roger entitled to be paid for this, or should he pass his commission through to the customer?
I will support my body corporate manager as he is a very honest and reliable person and I just want people to know how the process works as I have queried this a while ago.
Thank you
Add comment