by Kerry Larsen and Mat Churchill
Only a couple of weeks remain for the community to have its say on a proposed evacuation centre for the Douglas region.
And the debate on whether to pursue the project as a multi-purpose facility - complete with sporting facilities, a possible indoor cinema, or library has been turned on its head with the idea of using existing holiday accommodation as evacuation facilities.
It follows a push by community members and Member for Cook, Jason O'Brien, for a new elevated evacuation centre to be built at Mowbray Street, adjacent to the Port Douglas Community Centre (see The Newsport article 'Time Running Out for Evacuation Centre', Wednesday 1 June), or to extend Port Douglas State School in Reef Park.
Member for Leichardt, Warren Enstch, and Port Douglas Chamber of Commerce president, Ken Dobbs, have pitched in on the debate, citing existing buildings within the holiday accommodation sector could be the answer.
"Rather than get a stand-alone facility, if we get funding and put it towards public infrastructure that can be incorporated into an existing building, that may be a better outcome," Mr Entsch said.
"That building could be at the Sheraton Mirage, for example, a facility that can be used at other times of the year.
"This is a challenge for the community to come up with some ideas that increase the delivery of services to the area and short-list the best ones."
Mr Dobbs also supports the use of existing facilities for evacuation centre by stating vacant holiday apartments could be used in the event of a cyclone.
"The evacuation centre is for two reasons, the wind and tidal surge, and there's not a lot of land around Port Douglas that is high enough," Mr Dobbs said.
"Most of the apartment buildings in Port Douglas are three levels, the middle level has concrete below and above.
"If you're in a place that is one floor up with concrete roof and concrete floor and another floor to go up if things get tight with water, that should be pretty safe.
"We could possibly have 1000 of those apartments in Port Douglas that are vacant in the wet season."
Mr Dobbs says the idea could be a more financially sustainable outcome in the coming years.
"Obviously you would need to establish a contract with various properties which were considered suitable.
"If it required a payment by the government at some level, that payment would be a small percentage for outlay of capital costs of building something, minus
some of the operating costs and the depreciation and maintenance," he said.
"That's not only saving five or ten million dollars in initial outlay, but the cost over the years associated with maintaining a building."
However Russell Jean, who has been campaigning for a new evacuation centre/community complex, said the idea is impractical.
"Who's going to pay for the rooms and at what price?
"Say if we get devastation like Cardwell and I'm in there for a month, I'm in there for two months. What do you do? You can't expect private enterprise to carry that fee.
When Cyclone Yasi was bearing down on the East coast earlier this year, a number of resort managers such as Club Tropical and Nautilus Apartments opened thier doors to offer shelter from the storm, which thankfully tracked south of our region.
"I don't think you'd have any dramas whatsoever with a private resort saying 'yeah, jump in' for the period it takes for that cyclone to come and go, then I would expect they'd be saying 'out you get,'" Mr Jean said.
"All these sorts of places, all they are is a short term fix...the idea is is to have the (evacuation) centre that caters for 2,000 people.
"That centre is there for the initial impact, and then it becomes a recovery centre.
"If we don't get in now and run with this as much as we can we're going to miss the boat."
as per YASI's forcasts. The Disater Center must be built on high ground away from the coast or a bunker on top of island point.
I have seen the multipurpose facility in Cooktown which Russell Jean was instrumental in securing for the town, and it is absolutely fantastic. It provides year round access for sporting groups to play and train, public meetings, events both public and private and an emergency evacuation point with power, water and enough space for everyone.
There is absolutely no reason why Port Douglas cannot ask all levels of government to contribute to a range of projects in the area - the Sheraton redevelopment, a desperately needed evacuation centre and a lagoon pool - IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET. We need to be loud about what we need and want here, because other towns are currently louder than us and getting what they want.
2.Shelter buildings would be located within the locality’s community facilities and could be normally utilised on a daily or frequent basis such as halls/auditoriums, theatres or indoor sports courts. They could be located in existing government facilities such as schools, technical and further education colleges and the like. The facilities are not to be vacant shelters that are only intended for use in emergencies.
4.Shelters are to be active civic assets, capable of housing more than 500 people at a time. They will be community facilities:
•designed for multi-functional use
•the current intention is for cyclone shelters to be located on State owned sites
•fully-equipped for functioning as shelters and contain storage space for emergency bedding, fresh water and non-perishable food
•fitted with toilet and shower facilities
•ideally have adjoining helicopter landing access (e.g. oval)
This information may put into context why private evacuation facilities will probably not be considered, particularly in relation to the condition of the facilities being built on state-owned sites.
What about the recovery situation after devastation?
I don't understand the resistance from within, isn't half the project a donation??
I believe Port Douglas and surrounding residents NEED this.
I also believe the question of where it should go, should only be answered by where it would have the BEST CHANCE of SAVING LIVES in the event of a Category 5 cyclone crossing the coast at POrt Douglas, all other considerations should be second.
The current proposal from the council seems to have taken this into consideration.
The consideration of providing an indoor activity centre for locals, seem well suited to the school site, with our kids(in my opinion, likely to be the biggest users) being able to access the hall with ease, during and after school, all year round.
With the clock ticking, having the CRC proposal on the table and in the running for the money, can only help Port Douglas' chances.
This is one very rare chance at a large donation for Port Douglas residents, which I feel should not be missed or sidetracked.
While there at it we need a public pool as well......
As poinrted out by Steve Hull, the UAE dollars were given with a stipulation, why do people keep trying to change the rules or complicate matters?
the press release regarding the donation from the UAE($30 million) states that the shelters will be 99.9 percent used as facilities for indoor activities for people(locals) ALL YEAR round.
hopefully we NEVER have to use it as an evacuation center.
the fact is that as local families we go into a weather induced hibernation for 4-5 months each year.we have no 'adequate' indoor facilities in our town for local people to gather.
this facility is important to the future of port douglas,a healthy addition to our community.
STOP with the SHORT TERM thinking and start planning for the future.
Add comment