Tue 22 May

Wednesday 15 June 2011

Evac centre a last resort

Sue and Mick Whalen from Nautlius Apartments housed a number of visitors and locals as Cyclone Yasi approached.

by Kerry Larsen and Mat Churchill  

Only a couple of weeks remain for the community to have its say on a proposed evacuation centre for the Douglas region.

And the debate on whether to pursue the project as a multi-purpose facility - complete with sporting facilities, a possible indoor cinema, or library has been turned on its head with the idea of using existing holiday accommodation as evacuation facilities.

It follows a push by community members and Member for Cook, Jason O'Brien, for a new elevated evacuation centre to be built at Mowbray Street, adjacent to the Port Douglas Community Centre (see The Newsport article 'Time Running Out for Evacuation Centre', Wednesday 1 June), or to extend Port Douglas State School in Reef Park.

Member for Leichardt, Warren Enstch, and Port Douglas Chamber of Commerce president, Ken Dobbs, have pitched in on the debate, citing existing buildings within the holiday accommodation sector could be the answer.

"Rather than get a stand-alone facility, if we get funding and put it towards public infrastructure that can be incorporated into an existing building, that may be a better outcome," Mr Entsch said.

"That building could be at the Sheraton Mirage, for example, a facility that can be used at other times of the year.

"This is a challenge for the community to come up with some ideas that increase the delivery of services to the area and short-list the best ones."

Mr Dobbs also supports the use of existing facilities for evacuation centre by stating vacant holiday apartments could be used in the event of a cyclone.

"The evacuation centre is for two reasons, the wind and tidal surge, and there's not a lot of land around Port Douglas that is high enough," Mr Dobbs said.

"Most of the apartment buildings in Port Douglas are three levels, the middle level has concrete below and above.

"If you're in a place that is one floor up with concrete roof and concrete floor and another floor to go up if things get tight with water, that should be pretty safe.

"We could possibly have 1000 of those apartments in Port Douglas that are vacant in the wet season."

Mr Dobbs says the idea could be a more financially sustainable outcome in the coming years.

"Obviously you would need to establish a contract with various properties which were considered suitable.

"If it required a payment by the government at some level, that payment would be a small percentage for outlay of capital costs of building something, minus
some of the operating costs and the depreciation and maintenance," he said.

"That's not only saving five or ten million dollars in initial outlay, but the cost over the years associated with maintaining a building."

However Russell Jean, who has been campaigning for a new evacuation centre/community complex, said the idea is impractical.

"Who's going to pay for the rooms and at what price?

"Say if we get devastation like Cardwell and I'm in there for a month, I'm in there for two months. What do you do? You can't expect private enterprise to carry that fee.

When Cyclone Yasi was bearing down on the East coast earlier this year, a number of resort managers such as Club Tropical and Nautilus Apartments opened thier doors to offer shelter from the storm, which thankfully tracked south of our region.

"I don't think you'd have any dramas whatsoever with a private resort saying 'yeah, jump in' for the period it takes for that cyclone to come and go, then I would expect they'd be saying 'out you get,'" Mr Jean said.

"All these sorts of places, all they are is a short term fix...the idea is is to have the (evacuation) centre that caters for 2,000 people.

"That centre is there for the initial impact, and then it becomes a recovery centre.

"If we don't get in now and run with this as much as we can we're going to miss the boat." 

Have your say!

We ask you to provide your full name and valid email address to ensure your comments'' legitimacy is acknowledged.  Editor reserves the right to amend comments in accordance with Publisher’s Terms and Conditions.    Click here for full publishers terms and conditions for reader comments.

 

Kevin Woods, 16-06-11 10:36:
To ignore the disasters of a tsnami, or earthquake, would be unwise. Being in a cyclone area, and the chance of a large tidal surge
as per YASI's forcasts. The Disater Center must be built on high ground away from the coast or a bunker on top of island point.
Natalie Johnson, 16-06-11 10:34:
The need for public infrastructure in Port Douglas is very real. I for one, when Yasi was bearing down on us, was very confused as to where I should take my two small girls. We ended up bunking down on the third floor of Cayman Villas in my partners apartment - although solid - I could not tell you if it was Cat 5 rated or not. Ironically, the Managers of Cayman had to force their remaining guests to leave the property and head to Mossman. Using existing accommodation is not good enough in a time of crisis. As pointed out above, it not just the time the crisis is happening, it can be the weeks/months afterwards people need support.

I have seen the multipurpose facility in Cooktown which Russell Jean was instrumental in securing for the town, and it is absolutely fantastic. It provides year round access for sporting groups to play and train, public meetings, events both public and private and an emergency evacuation point with power, water and enough space for everyone.

There is absolutely no reason why Port Douglas cannot ask all levels of government to contribute to a range of projects in the area - the Sheraton redevelopment, a desperately needed evacuation centre and a lagoon pool - IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET. We need to be loud about what we need and want here, because other towns are currently louder than us and getting what they want.
Linda Cooper, 16-06-11 10:11:
In reading this debate it appears that two of the major conditions for funding have been discluded from the options suggested in this article. The two conditions below are extracts from the summary guide of requirements:

2.Shelter buildings would be located within the locality’s community facilities and could be normally utilised on a daily or frequent basis such as halls/auditoriums, theatres or indoor sports courts. They could be located in existing government facilities such as schools, technical and further education colleges and the like. The facilities are not to be vacant shelters that are only intended for use in emergencies.

4.Shelters are to be active civic assets, capable of housing more than 500 people at a time. They will be community facilities:
•designed for multi-functional use
•the current intention is for cyclone shelters to be located on State owned sites
•fully-equipped for functioning as shelters and contain storage space for emergency bedding, fresh water and non-perishable food
•fitted with toilet and shower facilities
•ideally have adjoining helicopter landing access (e.g. oval)

This information may put into context why private evacuation facilities will probably not be considered, particularly in relation to the condition of the facilities being built on state-owned sites.
Russell Jean, 16-06-11 09:43:
I cant believe that two persons, one who wants to have us here in Port Douglas and the surrounds VOTE FOR HIM in the next election not support any infrastructure being obtained for the use of his possible constituents?? It appears he has an agenda with the Sheraton??? And the President of the Chamber of Commerce, well what is the charter of the chamber?? Is it to assist the busioness people and the community at large?? Shouldnt he be a strong advocate for any infrastructure which I can only see would help him and his members. I cant believe anybody in Port and Mossman and the surrounds wouldnt support the chance to get much needed infrastructure?? I would expect to see Warren and Ken supporting this project and infact should be lobbying on behalf of us with all and sundry so as to get this centre here in Port Douglas. Please lets see in the last couple of weeks some positive supporting comments/stories from these two leaders??? to get this project across the line. Warren needs to lobby for extra Federal funds to match the State contibution and Ken should be working on the CRC to get funds from them and thewn we could get the much needed centre to cater for the possible disasters that present and also to cater for many multi purpose events. Come on Warren and Ken get behind Port Douglas community and not the private sector.
Sue Lawrence, 15-06-11 20:56:
The community cannot rely on existing holiday accommodation to house 2000+ evacuees in the event of another Yasi. I cannot even imagine how this could be co-ordinated, let alone the legalities that go with it.

What about the recovery situation after devastation?

I don't understand the resistance from within, isn't half the project a donation??
John Dowell, 15-06-11 20:30:
A public shelter capable of SAVING LIVES in the event of a Catagory 5 Cyclone crossing the coast at Port Douglas is on offer.
I believe Port Douglas and surrounding residents NEED this.
I also believe the question of where it should go, should only be answered by where it would have the BEST CHANCE of SAVING LIVES in the event of a Category 5 cyclone crossing the coast at POrt Douglas, all other considerations should be second.
The current proposal from the council seems to have taken this into consideration.
The consideration of providing an indoor activity centre for locals, seem well suited to the school site, with our kids(in my opinion, likely to be the biggest users) being able to access the hall with ease, during and after school, all year round.
With the clock ticking, having the CRC proposal on the table and in the running for the money, can only help Port Douglas' chances.
This is one very rare chance at a large donation for Port Douglas residents, which I feel should not be missed or sidetracked.
nick g, 15-06-11 17:43:
p,s what a nice looking couple in this photo...
nick g, 15-06-11 17:43:
I'd hate to be one of the 'powers to be' to knock back this multi functional centre only for a cyclone to wreack havoc on this town in the near future & claim lives! Our luck will be up one day!!
Damian p, 15-06-11 17:28:
The community needs a centre for sports and general community activities. If it doubles up as a shelter then even more reason to build it.

While there at it we need a public pool as well......
liz perriam, 15-06-11 17:28:
I read with interest the proposal that apartment/resort buildings be used. It was a fact that during YASI some resorts relocated their guests because they didn't want to be liable for Public Liability Claims!
As poinrted out by Steve Hull, the UAE dollars were given with a stipulation, why do people keep trying to change the rules or complicate matters?
steve hull, 15-06-11 08:48:
i must say i am very alarmed and confused with the comments by the people who SUPPOSEDLY have the communities best interests at heart.
the press release regarding the donation from the UAE($30 million) states that the shelters will be 99.9 percent used as facilities for indoor activities for people(locals) ALL YEAR round.

hopefully we NEVER have to use it as an evacuation center.

the fact is that as local families we go into a weather induced hibernation for 4-5 months each year.we have no 'adequate' indoor facilities in our town for local people to gather.
this facility is important to the future of port douglas,a healthy addition to our community.
STOP with the SHORT TERM thinking and start planning for the future.

Add comment

* - required field

*
*
*
*

To top

Port douglas news daily